Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1759 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 15% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $42.14 vs $49.74
- Up to 12% better value when playing Valorant than Celeron G4900 - $0.07 vs $0.08 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Valorant than Core i3-3250 - 697 vs 690 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
690
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€46.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €46.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |