Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3496 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $65.81 vs $424.08
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 52% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-3250 - 238 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 24 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Buy for €470.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
18.851878100637844%
Multi-Core
1130
6.464900738028491%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |