Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2219 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $42.15 vs $150.5
- Up to 70% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 7 3700X - $0.37 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3250 - 137 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
128
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€46.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €46.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Buy for €167.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |