Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600G is 2599 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 54% cheaper than Ryzen 5 4600G - $35.09 vs $76.05
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 4600G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
- Performs up to 7% better in Deathloop than Core i3-3250 - 180 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 12 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €38.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74725 minutes ago
Buy for €84.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74724 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 4600G |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |