Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3250 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3250 is 229 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8300 - 153 vs 151 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than FX-8300 - $41.2 vs $81.91
- Up to 50% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8300 - $0.3 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €45.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14598 minutes ago
Buy for €90.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14599 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |