Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 5% cheaper than Pentium G4400 - $18.79 vs $19.74
- Up to 8% better value when playing Deathloop than Pentium G4400 - $0.12 vs $0.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Pentium G4400 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Core i3-3240T - 170 vs 168 FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
168
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Buy for €21.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |