Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3676 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $18.79 vs $357.41
- Up to 93% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-13900K - $0.13 vs $1.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 36% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-3240T - 214 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 32 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
157
73%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Buy for €396.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |