Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $18.79 vs $350.97
- Up to 94% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i9-13900 - $0.12 vs $1.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 13% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i3-3240T - 202 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 32 vs 4 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
178
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Buy for €389.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |