Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $18.79 vs $321.73
- Up to 93% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900K - $0.12 vs $1.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3240T - 194 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 20 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
168
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
Buy for €357.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 293 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |