Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $18.79 vs $318.06
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 5% better in Dishonored 2 than Core i3-3240T - 268 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 20 vs 4 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76570 minutes ago
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76571 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
26.23239436619718%
Multi-Core
971
11.530697066856668%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |