Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 1858 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - $18.79 vs $152.09
- Up to 87% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-8700K - $0.16 vs $1.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3240T - 137 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 12 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
127
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13358 minutes ago
Buy for €168.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13359 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |