Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1366 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $18.79 vs $91.4
- Up to 73% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-6900K - $0.16 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 32% better in War Thunder than Core i3-3240T - 171 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 16 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
130
76.0233918128655%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
27.11864406779661%
Price, €
€101.45
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
35.70287539936102%
Multi-Core
971
13.641472323686429%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |