Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $18.79 vs $106.02
- Up to 82% better value when playing Resident Evil Village than Core i5-11600KF - $0.07 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Resident Evil Village than Core i3-3240T - 311 vs 291 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 12 vs 4 threads
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
291
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
311
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
18%
Price, €
€117.68
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €117.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |