Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-10500 - $18.79 vs $102.37
- Up to 78% better value when playing New World than Core i5-10500 - $0.21 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10500 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 19% better in New World than Core i3-3240T - 117 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 12 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
98
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
21%
Price, €
€113.63
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |