Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 2189 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i3-9100 - $18.79 vs $58.89
- Up to 67% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i3-9100 - $0.12 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 2% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i3-3240T - 181 vs 178 FPS
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
178
98.34254143646409%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
33.33333333333333%
Price, €
€65.37
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €65.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
32.41479332849892%
Multi-Core
971
26.994717820405896%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |