Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3410 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 36% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $18.79 vs $29.24
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 67% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-3240T - 391 vs 234 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76803 minutes ago
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76803 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
27.885215221459763%
Multi-Core
971
36.016320474777444%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |