Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2038 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 62% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $18.79 vs $49.74
- Up to 60% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron G4900 - $0.2 vs $0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 4% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Core i3-3240T - 110 vs 106 FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
106
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18482 minutes ago
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18482 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |