Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2038 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 52% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $18.79 vs $39.15
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-3240T - 147 vs 144 FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76784 minutes ago
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76784 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
72.56493506493507%
Multi-Core
971
92.38820171265462%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |