Buy on Amazon
€20.86
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 454 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 45% cheaper than Celeron G1820 - $18.79 vs $33.94
- Up to 45% better value when playing Valheim than Celeron G1820 - $0.11 vs $0.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i3-3240T - 190 vs 189 FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
189
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3240T CPU Used 2-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 2.9 GHz 3M 35W LGA1155
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Intel CPU BX80646G1820 Celeron G1820 2.70GHz 2M LGA1150 2C/2T Haswell
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.