Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3240T outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3240T is 91 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Performs up to 1% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Celeron G1610 - 88 vs 87 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - $18.79 vs $27.05
- Up to 31% better value when playing Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Celeron G1610 - $0.24 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
88
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |