Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2639 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $18.79 vs $1137.0
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-3240T - 166 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 64 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76865 minutes ago
Buy for €1,262.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76866 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
27.32273838630807%
Multi-Core
971
6.931753283837808%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |