Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2221 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $18.79 vs $548.4
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-3240T - 240 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76923 minutes ago
Buy for €608.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76924 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
35.086342229199374%
Multi-Core
971
13.026562919237994%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |