Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2498 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $18.79 vs $127.96
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 4% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-3240T - 260 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 16 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76520 minutes ago
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76521 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
27.02539298669891%
Multi-Core
971
11.984695137003209%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |