Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is 2408 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Performs up to 102% better in League of Legends than Core i3-3240T - 105 vs 52 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240T - 15 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 8 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
52
49.523809523809526%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44032 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 15 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |