Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 2577 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3500X - $18.79 vs $91.4
- Up to 72% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 5 3500X - $0.15 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 35% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-3240T - 188 vs 139 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 6 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
139
73.93617021276596%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58291 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
27.777777777777775%
Price, €
€101.45
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58293 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
28.745980707395496%
Multi-Core
971
16.5982905982906%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |