Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2790 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $18.79 vs $103.09
- Up to 80% better value when playing Fortnite than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.1 vs $0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 8% better in Fortnite than Core i3-3240T - 230 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 8 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
212
92.17391304347827%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2454 minutes ago
Buy for €114.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2461 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
26.766467065868266%
Multi-Core
971
16.761608838253064%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |