Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2634 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 51% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - $18.79 vs $38.36
- Up to 49% better value when playing Elden Ring than Athlon 3000G - $0.19 vs $0.37 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3240T - 116 vs 110 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
110
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Buy for €42.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |