Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 735 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 55 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 8% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Core i3-3240 - 118 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 8 vs 4 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
109
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 135 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |