Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 3501 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-12900KS - $29.98 vs $273.83
- Up to 87% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-12900KS - $0.17 vs $1.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 55 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-3240 - 226 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
192
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10080 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
226
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.34/FPS
12%
Price, €
€303.95
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €303.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10090 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |