Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3930K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3930K is 294 days older than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - $29.98 vs $204.73
- Up to 85% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i7-3930K - $0.13 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Performs up to 1% better in Apex Legends than Core i3-3240 - 261 vs 258 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 12 vs 4 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
258
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6815 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
261
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
14%
Price, €
€227.25
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €227.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6815 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |