Buy on Amazon
€33.28
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2038 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 23% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $29.98 vs $39.15
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-3240 - 463 vs 456 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i3-3240 3.4GHz 3.40GHz 3M SR0RH Socket 1155 Ivy Bridge CPU Processor
Buy for €33.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.