Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - $29.98 vs $336.34
- Up to 97% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - $0.21 vs $6.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 31% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-3240 - 207 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 16 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
158
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 277 minutes ago
Buy for €373.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 278 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |