Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2054 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $29.98 vs $138.2
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 6% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i3-3240 - 482 vs 454 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 16 vs 4 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for €33.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Buy for €153.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
44.497991967871485%
Multi-Core
1137
18.599705545558646%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |