Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3240 outperforms the more expensive FX-8120 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3240 is 327 days newer than the more expensive FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8120 - 117 vs 114 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than FX-8120 - $32.19 vs $57.05
- Up to 45% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8120 - $0.31 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €35.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |