Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2634 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 22% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - $29.98 vs $38.36
- Up to 19% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Athlon 3000G - $0.22 vs $0.27 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-3240 - 155 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
150
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
Buy for €42.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |