Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2634 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 58% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - $29.98 vs $72.2
- Up to 57% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Athlon 3000G - $0.15 vs $0.35 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-3240 - 229 vs 224 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
224
97.81659388646288%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
42.85714285714286%
Price, €
€80.14
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €80.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
57.88923719958202%
Multi-Core
1137
57.56962025316456%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |