Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i3-3227U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2669 days newer than Core i3-3227U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i3-3227U - 203 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3227U - 16 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€177.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €177.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3227U | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |