Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $43.43 vs $396.76
- Up to 87% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i9-13900 - $0.26 vs $1.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 20% better in HITMAN 3 than Core i3-3220T - 225 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 32 vs 4 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
188
83.55555555555556%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.96/FPS
13.26530612244898%
Price, €
€440.4
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €440.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
16.875460574797348%
Multi-Core
941
5.728722756605382%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |