Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $43.43 vs $190.07
- Up to 71% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900 - $0.32 vs $1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 28% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-3220T - 193 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
151
78.23834196891191%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1577 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
29.35779816513761%
Price, €
€210.98
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €210.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1585 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
21.502347417840376%
Multi-Core
941
10.673774954627948%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |