Buy on Amazon
€64.93
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $58.5 vs $178.41
- Up to 47% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-10900F - $0.44 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 62% better in F1 23 than Core i3-3220T - 240 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 20 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-3220T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
148
61%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.93
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3220T Dual-Core Processor 2.8 Ghz 3MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637i33220T
Buy for €64.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
240
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
53%
Price, €
€198.04
32%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €198.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-3220T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.