Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700 is 1583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - $43.43 vs $130.44
- Up to 67% better value when playing Control than Core i7-7700 - $0.24 vs $0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i3-3220T - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 8 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
199
98.51485148514851%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
33.33333333333333%
Price, €
€144.79
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €144.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
32.97336213102952%
Multi-Core
941
21.09865470852018%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |