Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2318 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $43.43 vs $61.85
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i3-3220T - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 6 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €48.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Buy for €68.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
33.236574746008706%
Multi-Core
941
19.466280513032686%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |