Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4690K is 637 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-4690K - $43.43 vs $53.52
- Up to 9% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-4690K - $0.49 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 35 vs 88 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 13% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-3220T - 111 vs 98 FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
98
88.28828828828829%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
111
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
90.74074074074073%
Price, €
€59.41
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for €59.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
35.58663558663559%
Multi-Core
941
25.915725695400717%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 88 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |