Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3210 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3210 is 120 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $43.43 vs $51.18
- Up to 62% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i3-3210 - $0.1 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-3220T - 506 vs 504 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
504
99.60474308300395%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
506
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
38.46153846153847%
Price, €
€56.81
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |