Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1386 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-3220 - 121 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $57.05 vs $57.77
- Up to 5% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-3220 - $0.52 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €64.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16810 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16811 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |