Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4144 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $67.25 vs $381.43
- Up to 80% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i9-14900F - $0.46 vs $2.25 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Core i3-3220 - 188 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 32 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
163
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11652 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.25/FPS
20%
Price, €
€423.39
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €423.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11664 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |