Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 4144 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $67.25 vs $423.33
- Up to 79% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i9-14900 - $0.94 vs $4.48 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 33% better in Remnant II than Core i3-3220 - 105 vs 79 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 32 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
79
75.23809523809524%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 248 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
105
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.48/FPS
20.982142857142854%
Price, €
€469.9
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €469.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
17.820773930753564%
Multi-Core
1085
6.839815923847949%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |