Buy on Amazon
€59.17
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700T is 1583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - $53.31 vs $109.68
- Up to 48% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-7700T - $0.37 vs $0.71 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-3220 - 171 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
158
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59.17
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3220 Processor (3M Cache, 3.30 GHz) BX80637i33220
Buy for €59.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Intel Core i7 i7-7700T Quad-core (4 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 1 MB
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Core i7-7700T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.