Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6400 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6400 is 1032 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-3220 - 238 vs 230 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $45.19 vs $67.25
- Up to 34% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i3-3220 - $0.21 vs $0.32 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
230
96.63865546218487%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
65.625%
Price, €
€74.65
67%
Buy for €74.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
238
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €50.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
47.25472547254726%
Multi-Core
1085
35.89149851141251%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |