Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $67.25 vs $584.95
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 29% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-3220 - 197 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €74.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Buy for €649.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
22.925764192139738%
Multi-Core
1085
10.097719869706841%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |