Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3220 and the cheaper Core i3-3220T have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-3220T - 452 vs 444 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $43.43 vs $67.25
- Up to 35% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-3220 - $0.11 vs $0.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
452
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
64.70588235294117%
Price, €
€74.65
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for €74.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1706 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
444
98.23008849557522%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1706 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
87.23809523809524%
Multi-Core
941
86.72811059907835%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220T |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |