Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3220 is 605 days older than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G1840 - 452 vs 450 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
452
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3672 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
96.19047619047619%
Multi-Core
854
78.70967741935485%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |